Al AswanyBachrach The Editors Hakakian Kara-Murza Kirchick Krastev Marlowe Muravchik Ozel  Zantovsky

World Affairs Summer 2008

Spring 2008

Print
Email
ResizeResize Text: Original Large XLarge Untitled Document Subscribe

FDR and GWB: Unlearned Lessons of a Wartime Presidency

George W. Bush claimed the attacks of September 11, 2001, would transform American thinking about the world. His model was Pearl Harbor, and he and his supporters routinely summoned the analogy to muster popular support for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. But the effect of 9/11 has faded, at least as it pertains to Iraq. The comparative quiet in that country during the past several months—combined with the mortgage debacle in this country and incipient recession—has tilted the weight of complaints against the Bush administration from the Iraq War to the economy.

The failure of 9/11 to generate the kind of lasting change in public attitudes wrought by Pearl Harbor reveals something important about the political culture of wartime America. High casualty rates aren’t the central issue. More Americans died in single days during World War II than have died altogether in Iraq. Yet support for the antifascist war never faltered. Nor did it diminish even in hindsight, when the Cold War revealed that victory over Germany and Japan hadn’t solved America’s problems after all. No other American war has had such staying power; sixty years later, the bloodiest war Americans fought against foreign foes remains, as ever, the “good war.”

To point out that the critical component here is leadership may be to repeat a cliché, but it is nonetheless true. America can be led to war with remarkable ease. But it can be kept at war—kept wholeheartedly, in the face of mounting casualties—only if the American people have been persuaded that the war bears a direct relation to their security. World War II passed the test, largely because Franklin D. Roosevelt devoted substantial effort to bracing Americans for the coming challenge. Roosevelt, in turn, had paid close attention to the experiences of two earlier wartime presidents, whose failures he observed at close range. Bush, choosing to emulate the wrong Roosevelt, has repeated nearly all of them.
ping.

H. W. Brands is professor of history at the University of Texas. He is the author of Andrew Jackson: His Life and Times and The Age of Gold: The California Gold Rush and the New American Dream, among other books.

The full text of this article is available by subscription only.

In this Issue

On this Topic

  • Dire Straits: Taking on Somali Pirates Pirates thrive on political instability and geographic mobility — and eastern Africa offers both in spades. An expert in the field, Martin N. Murphy explains why Somali piracy is a threat to the West, and what we need to do to stop it. July/August 2010 
  • FDR and GWB: Unlearned Lessons of a Wartime Presidency Spring 2008 (Abstract) 
  • Fearful Asymmetry: Reading the Goldstone Report James Traub argues that, despite its flaws, the Goldstone Report points up the fundamental contradiction between the needs of great powers and the demands of international law. March/April 2010 
  • Goldstone: An Exegesis Joshua Muravchik rebuts James Traub's recent World Affairs article on the Goldstone Report. Traub then offers a brief reply. May/June 2010 
  • The Gray Zone: Defining Torture New York Times Book Review editor Barry Gewen reviews the arguments for and against torture and concludes that, in certain narrow instances, the likes of Dick Cheney and other advocates just may have a point. May/June 2010 
  • Unruly Clients: The Trouble with Allies We just gave $7.5 billion to Pakistan and got ridiculed by the parliament, army chief, and former president. We give Yemen $121 million each year and it remains a terrorist hotbed. What, exactly, have we bought into? March/April 2010 

By this Author

©2010 American Peace Society · 1319 Eighteenth Street, NW, Washington, DC · 20036 · Web@WorldAffairsJournal.org

Untitled Document