Quantcast

As Opposition Grows, Kremlin Resorts to Gerrymander

In the face of growing public discontent and a clear upward trend for the opposition—Alexei Navalny’s 27 percent of the vote in last month’s Moscow mayoral election was a wake-up call—the Russian authorities are considering their strategy for keeping the political system under control. The election for the Moscow City Duma, scheduled for September 2014, will be a particularly important test. In the current legislature of Russia’s capital city, “elected” in a sham 2009 vote, 91 percent of seats are occupied by Vladimir Putin’s United Russia party, with the rest taken by the docile Communists. Given the levels of protest sentiments, the next Moscow Duma could look very different and become an important and high-profile political platform for Kremlin opponents.

The Ominous Return of Putin's Media Enforcer

The recent return of Vladimir Putin’s longtime éminence grise, Vladislav Surkov, to the Kremlin was widely discussed in the media. Much less noticed was the appointment of Mikhail Lesin, Putin’s former information minister, as the new head of Gazprom-Media, Russia’s largest—and de facto state-run—media group, which incorporates several broadcast, print, and online outlets. Lesin’s return to a senior position is no less symbolic than that of Surkov—and says a lot about the Kremlin’s plans for Russia’s few remaining uncensored media.

Soviets' 'Abhorrent' Practice of Punitive Psychiatry Returns

Attributes of the Soviet system have been returning to Russia gradually, one by one, since Vladimir Putin assumed power in late 1999—from symbolic (such as the memorial plaque to Yuri Andropov and the Stalinist national anthem) to very tangible ones, including media censorship and political prisoners. This week, the Russian authorities have returned to one of the most horrid and frightful practices of the Soviet era: punitive psychiatry.

Is Europe with Russia or with Putin?

The task of restoring democracy and safeguarding human rights in Russia is a task for Russian citizens and no one else. But it would help if our friends and neighbors in Europe stopped, in effect, supporting Vladimir Putin’s regime by lending it international credibility and allowing its crooked officials access to the European banking system. This was the essence of the arguments put forward by a delegation of Russian opposition members—including the author of this blog—invited to address a European Parliament hearing in Brussels earlier this week.

Saying ‘No’ to Putin in Sochi

In less than five months, Vladimir Putin will open the XXII Olympic Winter Games in Russia’s subtropical Black Sea resort of Sochi. For the Kremlin leader, the Sochi Games are not about sport—they are about political prestige and international legitimacy. No expense is spared for the president’s personal pet project. Putin’s Olympics have already cost more than all the Winter Games combined since their inception in 1924. Only the amount of money stolen during construction has been estimated at $30 billion. Olympic preparations were marred not only by corruption, but also by forced evictions of local residents, severe environmental damage, and mistreatment of construction workers, including torture.

Boris Nemtsov: Elected by Voters, Prosecuted by Kremlin

Vladimir Putin does not like Boris Nemtsov. He has made this abundantly clear throughout his presidency, including when he demanded that Nemtsov resign from Parliament for calling for peace talks in Chechnya, or when he bizarrely accused the opposition leader of “stealing billions” during a live television show. Not to mention such telling gestures from the Kremlin as Nemtsov’s New Year’s Eve arrest and imprisonment in 2010–11, or the decision in 2011 to deny registration to his party, barring it from the parliamentary election.

In Moscow, Official 'Win' Is a Big Loss for the Kremlin

Authoritarian regimes often hasten their end with their own arrogance and underestimation of opponents. Too often, they start believing their own propaganda. When, this past summer, the Russian authorities made the decision not to bar opposition leader Alexei Navalny from the Moscow mayoral election, the calculation was that he would receive a meager result, and the Kremlin would kill two birds with one stone—show that elections in Russia are “honest,” and that the opposition has “no support.” A July poll by the pro-Kremlin Public Opinion Foundation reported Navalny’s support in the Moscow election at 6 percent. Pro-Kremlin “analysts” confidently predicted that this figure was “the ceiling” for the opposition candidate.

Could Navalny Force a Political Crisis for Putin?

Moscow’s vote on September 8th will be much more than an election for mayor—although that in itself would be pretty important. For the first time in more than a decade, a political alternative is emerging in Russia—despite the media censorship, the administrative pressure, and the vastly superior resources of the ruling regime. Alexei Navalny’s insurgent campaign for Moscow mayor has already been described as Russia’s first modern (US-style) political campaign: he has met face-to-face with voters every day; raised funds through individual, often small, donations; drawn thousands of volunteers willing to contribute their time and effort; and inspired genuine public enthusiasm for a political cause not seen in Russia since at least the early 1990s.

That cause is not a particular program or even a particular candidate—it is change, after nearly 14 years of repressive and corrupt rule by Vladimir Putin and his associates from the former Soviet KGB and the Ozero dacha cooperative.

Honoring Yeltsin in Tallinn

Last week, a new monument was unveiled in the Estonian capital of Tallinn. The bas-relief mounted on Nunne Street, in Old Town, bears an inscription in three languages—Estonian, Russian, and English: “In memory of Russia’s first president, Boris Yeltsin, to honor his role in the peaceful restoration of Estonia’s independence in 1990–1991.”

Created by Estonian sculptor Rene Reinumae, the bas-relief is based on the bust of Yeltsin by legendary Russian sculptor Ernst Neizvestny. The idea of erecting a monument to Russia’s first (and, so far, only) democratically elected leader in the Estonian capital was conceived and realized by a nonprofit group, Memory Initiative (Malestuse initsiatiiv), whose members include Heiki Ahonen, director of the Museum of the Occupations and a former political prisoner; Marko Mihkelson, chairman of the Estonian Parliament’s foreign affairs committee; and Matti Pats, the grandson of Konstantin Pats, the first and last president of interwar independent Estonia. The funds for the bas-relief were raised from individual donations.

Remembering Seven Dissidents and Soviet Brutality

August 25, 1968, was one of the most important days in the history of the Soviet dissident movement. That Sunday, seven people came out into Moscow’s Red Square in an open demonstration of protest against the invasion of Czechoslovakia. Soviet tanks had rolled into that country on August 21st in an effort to suppress the “Prague Spring”—a dangerous precedent of political liberalization in the Communist bloc. Soviet newspapers demonstrated “nationwide support” for the invasion, while “workers’ collectives” across the country passed on-cue resolutions in favor of Operation Danube.

At noon on August 25th, seven people—Larisa Bogoraz, Konstantin Babitsky, Vadim Delaunay, Vladimir Dremlyuga, Pavel Litvinov, Natalya Gorbanevskaya, and Viktor Fainberg—sat down by the Place of Skulls on Red Square, across from the Kremlin’s Spasskaya gate. The demonstration was silent; the protesters raised a small Czechoslovak flag and makeshift posters reading “Long live free and independent Czechoslovakia!,” “Down with the occupiers!,” and, perhaps most famously, “For your freedom and ours!”

A Local Election in Yaroslavl, Russia's Opposition Capital

While most of the attention in the run-up to Russia’s September 8th regional elections has understandably been focused on the election for Moscow mayor, where protest leader Alexei Navalny is challenging the Kremlin-backed incumbent, Sergei Sobyanin, there are other campaigns of considerable interest—and considerable potential for new troubles for the regime.

Moscow’s Least Popular Mayoral Candidate

The Moscow mayoral election that takes place a month from now is Russia’s most heated political contest in years and will undoubtedly have nationwide ramifications. Fearful of a resumption of mass protests on the scale of 2011–2012, the authorities decided not to bar the leading opposition candidate, Alexei Navalny, from the ballot. The stakes could not be higher, either for the Kremlin or for the pro-democracy forces. The former wants to show that it can still win a relatively honest election, and the latter need to prove Moscow’s status as the main opposition stronghold.

According to the latest poll by Superjob research group, with four full weeks left in the campaign, the Kremlin-backed incumbent, Sergei Sobyanin, is supported by 53 percent of those who have already made up their minds. Navalny is in second place, with 32 percent. None of the remaining four candidates has more than 6 percent in the poll.

Navalny's Campaign for Mayor Returns Politics to Russia

This summer, Russia has skipped its traditional political lull. As the September 8th mayoral election draws closer, Moscow finds itself at the center of a heated campaign that would seem more appropriate in the free-wheeling 1990s than in the era of Putin’s authoritarian stagnation. For the first time in more than a decade, real politics and real competition have returned to Russia’s capital. The “culprit”? Alexei Navalny, the 37-year-old anticorruption campaigner who has emerged as a leading figure in the Russian protest movement since the 100,000-strong pro-democracy rallies in December 2011, which signaled the long-awaited political awakening of the country’s middle class.

Kremlin Arrests Leading Opposition Mayor

The Putin regime has a multitier system of ensuring that no genuine opponent ever comes near a position of power. For the most part, opposition candidates are simply barred from participating in elections—as happened with Mikhail Kasyanov and Vladimir Bukovsky in 2008; with the People’s Freedom Party in 2011; and with Grigory Yavlinsky in 2012.

Putin’s Police Raid Human Rights Group

“You are scaring the … public. Nothing like that is happening here,” Vladimir Putin told German ARD television in April. “There is no need to scare anybody [by saying] that someone is being seized, arrested, confiscated [sic] … There are some administrative sanctions, but I believe that they are absolutely within the bounds of civilized rules.” The Kremlin leader was responding to a question about the ongoing crackdown against Russian NGOs, which have been forced by a new law to label themselves as “foreign agents”—which, in the Russian language, is synonymous with “foreign spies.” Organizations that have refused to accept this slanderous label—including all of Russia’s leading human rights NGOs—are facing forced dissolution.

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - Vladimir Kara-Murza's blog